Latest Posts
Forum: Tuners - Windows 8
Last Reply: SmallTimePrankster (May 18 2013 02:34 PM)
Forum: Windows Media Center Plugins & Addons
Last Reply: BrianLewis (May 17 2013 11:45 AM)
Recent Topics
-
WTV Metadatajeffp3 - May 13 2013 10:02 PM
-
Apple TV as an extender?Ivan_ekbpf - May 12 2013 10:14 PM
-
Is this the Resurrection?aanda6 - May 12 2013 08:49 PM
-
Medicare for US ResidentsDean1M - May 09 2013 09:09 PM
-
Recommendations - Mobo / CPU / RAM / HDMI combinations
scott_mckenzie - May 09 2013 04:47 AM
0-255 vs. 16-235 Colour Range
#1
Posted 27 May 2012 - 06:47 PM
So, it's either 16-235 where TV looks poor & videos look good, or 0-255 where TV looks good & videos look poor.
I tried tweaking the codec for videos (FFDShow where you can set the range), but it didn't seem to do anything.
Any ideas how to reach a happy medium? I've tweaked codecs for years for things like denoise & resizing, but I've never tried to fiddle with the output colour space.
Justin
#2
Posted 27 May 2012 - 09:07 PM
I was doing a little bit of tweaking over the weekend (in MediaPortal, but I think it's the same in WMC) & I struck a bit of an issue with selecting the output colour range. By default, WMC will do 16-235 (i.e. for a TV, not a monitor), but with that, TV looks a bit washed out (grey blacks, that sort of thing). You can override it to do 0-255 (via registry or via video card drivers), but I noticed that when you do that, yes TV looks much better, but then videos (mostly h.264) are overblown & too dark & grainy with excessive banding.
So, it's either 16-235 where TV looks poor & videos look good, or 0-255 where TV looks good & videos look poor.
I tried tweaking the codec for videos (FFDShow where you can set the range), but it didn't seem to do anything.
Any ideas how to reach a happy medium? I've tweaked codecs for years for things like denoise & resizing, but I've never tried to fiddle with the output colour space.
Justin
The PQ will be largely dependant on the display panel/TV/projector and it's ability to handle PC level ( 0-255 ) video levels.
Both my Panasonic Plasma TV, and my BenQ W6000, by far, display a better ( IMO ) PQ with video levels ( 0-255 ), i'm using the default MS foundation codec BTW, for dvb-t FTA, H.264, VC-1 and mpeg2 video codecs.
Both my display panels are designed for a good static and dynamic contrast levels, and i have zero banding issues with either dvb-t FTA TV or video's.
Most modern HDMI panels/TV/projectors also have NVRAM configuration options for the recieved video level, PC (0-255) or video (16-235). Do you have such an option on your display device ?
I'm also using the default color settings in AMD CCC, and i have all forms of AMD CCC video post processing turned off, with the exception of manual VA de-interlacing.
Edited by bigdonk, 27 May 2012 - 09:41 PM.
#3
Posted 27 May 2012 - 09:47 PM
I agree that 0-255 looks best for TV, but for some reason videos are just wrong on my config. Same codec, different codec, doesn't seem to matter.
I can't see anything in the MediaInfo outputs of both the TV recordings (MPEG2 TS) & videos (AVC) that suggests that they should be that different (both are YUV 4:2:0), but I don't understand this stuff enough to know for sure.
I guess I'll just keep experimenting.
Justin
#4
Posted 28 May 2012 - 08:14 PM
50Hz likes 0-255, 59/60Hz likes 16-235.
Looks like I'll just have to live with washed out TV.
Justin














